In 2012 when I was interning at CAP the housing finance group was worried that it was too ambitious to even suggest mortgage cramdown and THEY LITERALLY JUST DID IT https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/1341112094079512579
Cramdown is a policy specifically meant to deal with negative equity!!! Home values are skyrocketing!!! It’s a policy purpose-built for the wrong crisis
When I was interning at CAP we couldn’t even advocate for cutting back the Mortgage Interest Deduction... it was too radical. Nonprofit funders wouldn’t like it. They literally just killed it in the TCJA. With cramdown, the levels of disillusionment I’m feeling, Staggering
*funders wouldn’t like it & neera wouldn’t like it*. God forbid we even suggest good policy because the Clinton and Obama people might not like it
Getting hopping mad about how Obama straight up lied about supporting cramdown
And of course on the ‘facts’ they were just straight up wrong. Assholes like Santelli were hooting and hollering about strategic defaults and it turns out that those are basically irrelevant. To see that all someone had to do was merge 2 datasets https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/b/1275/files/2020/07/Ganong_Noel_Strategic_July_2020-1.pdf
And the other argument that bank lobbyists/CEOs cried about was that they’d have to raise interest rates to compensate for cramdown risk. Well, rates are lower than they’ve ever been in US, who knows maybe world history. I guess one of us econos will have to write a paper on this
Same dynamic seems to play out in think-tanks, whole centers and departments exist to get foundation grants, and they write about and advocate for policies that foundations want https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1345836796043735044
You can follow @samh510.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.