Mark Zuckerberg thinks we're all "dumb asses" and he's of such superior intellect that we don't see through him. Well let's venture down that road a bit and shed some light on this perp.
This billionaire CEO of the toxic cesspool otherwise known as Facebook and his semi-philosophic take on free speech who loves to ramble in his Reddit-logic-bro-like ramblings, Zuckerberg constantly tries to forcefully rewrite the history of FaceBook's founding.
He clearly counts on us buying into this bullshit lie on how he was just trying to bring people together, when in fact he found a way to monetize hacking into everyone's personal life and sell your data for billions annually.
Zuckerberg said Facebook, was born out of the noblest of impulses to give "everyone a voice" in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Yes, you read that correctly.
Before we get into just how extremely bullshit we know this claim to be, it's worth reading it in its stupefying entirety.
Got that? Zuckerberg is implying Facebook was a manifestation of his belief that giving people a voice would make the world a better place. Except we know that isn't true. Like, not even remotely.
Facebook's origin story is an incredibly well documented, if messy one, and, unfortunately for the CEO, it paints him in a rather unflattering light to the radical feminist movement.
For those blissfully unaware, the development of TheFacebook followed on Zuckerberg's creation of a "Hot or Not" clone called Facemash, which scraped Harvard students' photos from an online directory and then asked students to rank the respective hotness of those pictured.
"The site was created entirely by Zuckerberg over the last week in October, after a friend gave him the idea,"

"The website used photos compiled from the online facebooks of nine Houses, placing two next to each other at a time and asking users to choose the 'hotter' person."
Now, Zuckerberg has repeatedly insisted that Facemash was totally separate from Facebook.

"The claim that Facemash was somehow connected to the development of Facebook... it isn't, it wasn't," he told Congress in 2018.
If we are to believe that claim, which is itself dubious, then we are still left with scores of records showing that Zuckerberg made Facebook with dating services in mind.

Horse Hockey
In this article he talks about his decision to delay working on a competitor's social network dubbed Harvard Connection so that he could get TheFacebook up in time. "I'm going to fuck them," He told his buddy, referring to Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra
Even Zuckerberg himself has, in the past, provided a sanitized retelling of his justification for launching Facebook that had nothing to do with the bullshit claims he makes today.
Now, there is itself nothing wrong with launching a dating or social website. However, when that site morphs into the democracy-eating beast that is the present-day Facebook, understanding how and why that transition happened is of some pretty serious import.
Self mythologizing your company's origin story to make yourself into a T-shirt-sporting statesman, and assuming we're all stupid enough to lap up those lies reflects an ongoing desire on the part of Zuckerberg to bend reality to his will.
For a person with such unparalleled power over both our elections and personal information, that should bother all of us. Unless, of course, us "dumbasses" are too dumb to notice. So lets talk about who this punk really is.
Truth is Zuckerberg began his existence as a blackhat hacker at Harvard and grew into worse from there. He should be doing time in prison. I had A long long conversation with Peter Thiel who gave the bastard his initial start up capital.
Facebook, launched its News Integrity Initiative on April 3, 2018 under the guise of trying to clean up the fake news that is rampant on his network and across all other platforms, when in fact it was an excuse to censor conservatives & sway the upcoming elections.
The Ford Foundation, City University of New York, the Mozilla Foundation and several other tech companies and nonprofits joined Zuckerberg to launch a $14 million fund supposedly dedicated to advancing news literacy, what a crock of shit.
The money invested in the News Integrity Initiative went straight to funding bot farms and rapid response, to openly attack conservative views on all platforms, giving the appearance to natural maturation when in fact it was a calculated move.
Zuckerberg & FaceBook got a huge amount of blowback once it was revealed that he had actually assisted Trump winning in 2016, by selling out data to Cambridge Analytica that Steve Bannon in turn gave access to Brad Parscale Trump's campaign tech manager.
The FBI & Mueller gave Zuckerberg some cover claiming the Russian's swayed the election by spending a little over $100K in "fake news" ads planted by them on Facebook and other platforms.
They said these "fake news" creators were from inside and outside the United States, aiming to make profits and disrupt the legitimate process of electing the nation's highest political figure.

Yeah Sure!
Amongst, Facebook found itself in a dilemma in 2017 after it was exposed he helped the Trump Campaign via Cambridge Analytica. Democrats were furious, and that's when the congressional committees starting going after him.
So Zuckerberg and his team sought out ways to censor the conservative movement Trump had birthed and disguise it as an automated and personalized fact-checking, and the News Integrity Initiative was born to do just that.
Other backers of this initiative include the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, AppNexus, the Craig Newmark Philanthropic Fund, the Democracy Fund, the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism and Betaworks.
All these companies pooled funding into Act Blue and Numerous other politically driven to put unprecedented funding into down ballot races and funding the fraud in the 2020 election.
Zuckerberg poured cash into an “ecosystem” that caused widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Zuckerberg used $500 million of “dark money” to unlawfully tip the scales in battleground states that Democrat Joe Biden won by narrow margins.
Basically Zuckerberg, was allowed in the counting room because he funded it, & the American people were kicked out. Zuckerberg funneled huge amounts of money into charities & nonprofits that lobbied officials & carried out other partisan activities that impacted the 2020 results.
He paid for election judges, purchased drop boxes, contrary to state laws, Zuckerberg’s money purchased machines Dominion and otherwise and Zuckerberg’s funding was contributed to Secretaries of State.
This injection of hundreds of millions of dollars into the election by Zuckerberg and others violated state election laws and resulted in an unequal distribution of funding that deprived voters of both due process and equal protection.
Zuckerberg's dark money network was established to collect, aggregate, and analyze information collected from third parties that have direct access to state voter files for the purpose of influencing U.S. elections and electoral policy.
Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, personally donate $500 million to so called "charities" in Battleground States concerned with election security, funding efforts to recruit poll workers, supply PPE, and set up drive-through voting, among other tactics.
Zuckerberg has openly claims since 2016 that his company is taking adequate measures to address the various externalities his platform has produced, from the spread of disinformation and conspiracy theories to the proliferation of harassment, bigotry and real world violence.
In other words they used his platform to suppress free speech of conservatives and shielded anything related to Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family. They blocked the reporting of the Nation's oldest newspaper the NY Post on Hunter Biden.
Zuckerberg allowed the articles run claiming 50 former Intelligence Community members including 5 former CIA Directors and Deputy Directors, to lay the claim that the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian disinformation, for the entire election cycle.
These claims in Zuckerberg's own words is a tacit admission of them influencing the election. With access to more data on the degradation of the American discourse than perhaps any other person on the planet.
Such an admission by Zuckerberg during the election cycle is surely a concern. Facebook also announced during the election it would provide more data to researchers about how the election plays out on its platform but the findings won’t contribute to solutions in this cycle.
You can follow @BluntForceTrut1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.