Written by sharp Najmul Hoda

While agreeing to this brilliant piece, I have a few questions here:

1) Why does AMU should be a representative of Muslims intellectualism, despite it being a den of Ashraf mindset + https://theprint.in/opinion/modi-is-reaching-out-amu-has-a-chance-to-take-muslims-away-from-path-of-confrontation/570584/ via @ThePrintIndia

where 85 percent of Muslims, who are Pasmanda have no say? AMU wasn't founded for incorporating progressive values among the community but maintaining the status quo.

2) Modern Muslim society where dissent is not allowed, where recently three students were haunted, because +

they hurt religious sentiment? If this is a modern society of Muslim, what does India can expect from the community?

3) As Najmul saheb says, Muslim are neither 'bada dushman' nor ' chota bhai', they are equal Indian citizen. So why

any PM should make special attempts to reach out to them? Or why paying tribute to APJ Kalam, giving statement at the Islamic Heritage Conference that (young) Muslims should be well-versed with the Holy Quran and the computer,
or many other such reasonable efforts for +

MusIim community's well-being like reforming Triple talaq, building 188 toilet at Ajmer Dargah, offering chaddar at Ajmer etc. should not be seen as an attempt to reach out the community?

4) Also, what does produce radicalise PhD students from AMU, what is root of it?