Think a root cause of some of the bad housing and climate discourse On Here is that a bunch of folks on the left have an ideological need to identify *an actor* who is *acting* and causing the problem.
The hundred corporations or Big Developers or gentrifying yuppies etc.
The hundred corporations or Big Developers or gentrifying yuppies etc.
But that frame turns out to be a bad fit for issues like unaffordable housing, where the problem is caused by what’s *not* happening.
Or see how disinvestment gets far less attention than gentrification despite being far more prevalent, b/c there’s not a clear responsible actor.
Or see how disinvestment gets far less attention than gentrification despite being far more prevalent, b/c there’s not a clear responsible actor.
And climate is similar in that the problem is a product of systems, not a small group of nefarious actors.
So while it’s fine to go after Chevron or whoever, it can’t be while ignoring the underlying reason why Chevron exists, which is to provide a product that *we all* demand.
So while it’s fine to go after Chevron or whoever, it can’t be while ignoring the underlying reason why Chevron exists, which is to provide a product that *we all* demand.
I think about how Hirsch and how Taylor argue that the value of White suburbs could not exist without the simultaneous existence of a Black ghetto.
You don’t see that if you look only at one piece or one actor of that system. https://twitter.com/trillharris/status/1340454759808032768
You don’t see that if you look only at one piece or one actor of that system. https://twitter.com/trillharris/status/1340454759808032768