Re-reading this by @JuliaLMarcus, which makes the point that risk-taking often reflects unmet needs, incl work, income, & *social connection.* This point abt connection is often overlooked in public (health) discourse abt COVID, but is critical. https://tinyurl.com/y2kkson3  1/
Research shows that social connections matter tremendously for health. See @MarioLuisSmall's “Someone to Talk To” for a beautiful description of the meaning of connections. My own collaborative work has examined the role of social relationships for a host of health outcomes. 2/
Folks are struggling, w loss, economic insecurity & uncertainty, and isolation. Social connections buffer against these struggles & serve to protect both physical & mental well-being. They don’t just make us feel good; they are good for us. For many, they are not dispensible. 5/
This doesn’t mean we abandon social distancing. Instead, officials must acknowledge that for many—including folks struggling w substance misuse & addiction and depression & anxiety—connectedness can be life-saving. 6/
We MUST encourage folks to continue to stay home. We must also make the inevitable gatherings safer by reducing other risks: eviction moratoriums, closures of restaurants & gyms combined w economic relief for individuals & businesses; decarceration; etc etc etc. 7/
Yes, tell people to stay home. Still as this piece by @JuliaLMarcus points out, “public health messaging will not solve structural problems.” For some, isolation just isn’t do-able. So officials make the inevitable gatherings safer. It’s not an either-or approach. 8/8
You can follow @CourtneyBoen.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.