For many reasons, this so-called report isn't plausible. Most obvious is that SCOTUS is not doing in-person conferences right now, so there could be no person see the justices go into a "closed room" or to hear "screaming through the walls."

Pure fantasy from grifters like Kyle. https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1339671014490451980
Also, the "obvious explanation" for why SCOTUS didn't take the case is the reason SCOTUS gave.

Which, you might recall, is the same reason I and other appellate litigators said SCOTUS wasn't going to take the case.
In addition to the big obvious reason someone couldn't have overheard screaming at SCOTUS during the conference on Texas' application, it's implausible for other reasons.

SCOTUS conferences don't leak. Anyone telling you they have inside info on a conference is certainly lying.
Second, I don't know what your workplace is like, but the justices do not scream at each other. Or anyone else. It's just not a plausible claim to make about any of the justices, or really anyone who works in the building.
To buy this guy's claim, you'd have to think SCOTUS was meeting in person (nope), someone could overhear (nope), that someone who would then leak to this dope (nope), and the justices scream at each other in conference (nope).

Be less stupid, Trump tryhards.
This is "the Marshal of the Supreme Court has informed Trump of his impending conviction, I take no pleasure, etc." levels of delusion about SCOTUS.
You can follow @gabrielmalor.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.