Read on Twitter
opening the "Comments from Local Jurisdictions" packet from the proposed RHNA methodology comment period
what a wonderfully wholesome start from the City of Alameda, rejecting special pleading & standing strong for equitable planning #rhnamtg
up next is the Town of Atherton: "satisfying the RHNA requirement as proposed would be nearly impossible to achieve without *fundamental* changes to the Town's land use framework"
that is indeed the point
I've said my piece about Atherton here: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/06/atherton-california-wealthy-zip-code-zoning
that is indeed the point
I've said my piece about Atherton here: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/06/atherton-california-wealthy-zip-code-zoning
the City of Belvedere "has been active in taking steps to meet regional housing needs" by doing what is required under state law & not a sliver more #rhnamtg
considering making this thread a review of city/town logos (Corte Madera thinks their allocation is too high)
the City of Campbell doesn't think development is feasible on their 6,000 sq ft lots
they must not be on housing twitter
they must not be on housing twitter
Colma is freaking out about an allocation of 183 new homes, you can literally achieve that in 1-3 new buildings bb #rhnamtg
Cupertino's letter is 5 pages (they're upset)
I'm not sure this is really making their point tho
Fairfax: we have no vacant land available for large scale development
Hillsborough & Atherton seem to have collaborated on their letters, which share a phrase:
"Satisfying this requirement will be impossible to achieve without *fundamental* changes to the Town's land use framework." #rhnamtg
"Satisfying this requirement will be impossible to achieve without *fundamental* changes to the Town's land use framework." #rhnamtg
Los Altos & Los Altos Hills want to pause on addressing our housing needs until we figure out the long term effects of COVID-19
I am pretty confident that people are still going to need homes, personally
I am pretty confident that people are still going to need homes, personally
Los Altos Hills: "The RHNA Methodology as currently proposed will result in communities around the Bay Area, and particularly in Santa Clara County, being forced to develop new housing at levels not seen since the post-war housing boom of the 1950s and 1960s"
Piedmont is a sensitive community concerned about the impacts of new luxury housing
Bay Area's 10 most segregated cities & their comments on the RHNA methodology
East Palo Alto: no comment
Ross: big mad
Belvedere: big mad
Sausalito: big mad
San Anselmo: big mad
Portola Valley: big mad
Fairfax: big mad
Woodside: big mad
Mill Valley: big mad
Cupertino: big mad
East Palo Alto: no comment
Ross: big mad
Belvedere: big mad
Sausalito: big mad
San Anselmo: big mad
Portola Valley: big mad
Fairfax: big mad
Woodside: big mad
Mill Valley: big mad
Cupertino: big mad
