A few notes around the reporting on this. Mobile security experts I spoke to were quite pessimistic about the overall situation, with several saying that despite major revelations of signalling abuses years ago the situation has deteriorated further.
i.e. third-party network access is the backbone of a lot of commonplace and essential internet activity. If network access points weren’t available on the market none of that would function so easily.
But it’s led to a situation where’s there’s seemingly a thorough penetration of networks that can be used in surveillance ops
If you’re a country with specific surveillance needs, and you don’t have the infrastructure of the NSA or GCHQ to fulfil these needs, then there’s a solution for you - go to the private sector for some commercial surveillance-as-a-service
(this would be ... most countries?)
We found evidence of surveillance ops leveraging multiple networks around the world at high speed in order to target a single individual - one example is in the piece but I came across plenty of others
The piece focuses on the Channel Islands because they came up again and again during the reporting. Guernsey’s regulator said this was the first time the issue had been brought to their attention, however.
Amnesty's @botherder has done a great context piece around our findings https://nex.sx/blog/2020/12/16/mobile-networks-are-a-trash-fire.html
I'd particularly flag a couple of things he says. 1. human rights defenders face heightened risks from this wholesale network penetration
and 2. mobile network operators are no longer “just” carriers of phone conversations - they are also gatekeepers to our digital identities
You can follow @cr0ft0n.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.