1/ MINI THEAD-RE: VICTORIA AND HUMAN RIGHTS BREACH
1. KEY POINTS:
A. Its opinion, not fact, not tested in court
B. Human Rights Charter remedies are only for the action to stop (not suing etc.) As it stopped months ago, this is moot.
LINKS TO DOCS AT END
2/
I suggest read the actual report, as news sites are omitting relevant information. My summary here
2. THE REPORT-DETAILS
A. It contains many recommendations as you would expect, stuff like having more interpreters and food options.
B. it also says the 'outside fenced exercise
3/
area was degrading an inhumane.
C. The comments about "Human Rights" are an opinion. The opinion was formed in the absence of
D. Some inconsistency in directions early on
E. Many of the problems with the lockdown appeared attributable to the immediacy of the intervention
4/
F. Decision made by Crisis Council of Cabinet , a special forum of Govt Ministers chaired by the Premier, the CHO had only 15 mins to decide.
F. Commentary appears directed at DHHS as they are the 'social landlord'
5/
G. The findings are “OPINION” (See Screen Grab below shows all of them. ANNOYINGLY the report does not specify which part of the human rights charter was considered in breach.
6/
H. The charter and its use is solely to deal with ‘Active’ issues. This is because the only remedies within the charter are to have the unlawful act stopped. (See Screen Grab). There is no provision for damages etc.
You can follow @SuxHypocrisy.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.