Seriously y’all, this would be like getting a PhD in physics and publicly INSISTING gravity acts at a distance instantaneously due to the Newtonian description, rather than at the speed of light, as determined from general relativity. https://twitter.com/joyofphysics/status/1339382409704296448
Also, like, why are you permitted to attain a PhD in literature without having some breadth in linguistics? I feel like the continually shifting of linguistic norms and usages fundamentally impacts the understanding and analysis of literature!!!
Like, haha, physicists and astronomers are bad at math, but this feels a hell of a lot like allowing someone to get a PhD in physics or astronomy without knowing how to do differential equations.
So, either you have some training in linguistics and are STILL a prescriptivist* which, uh, YIKES, or you lack a critical skillset for adequate literary analysis. Either way: this is embarrassing for Dr “All You Need To Know About Grammar Can Be Learned From Schoolhouse Rock.”
*AND NOT EVEN A GOOD PRESCRIPTIVIST BECAUSE SINGULAR THEY IN ENGLISH IS A VERY FUCKING OLD CONCEPT
TL;DR: don’t try to be a smug fucking nerd about gender, “biological sex”, gender expression, gender roles, sexuality, and fucking pronouns, because the queers of academia will ALWAYS outgun you on the nerd shit