@Project_Veritas @JamesOKeefeIII

Clinton State Department: "I can't recall..." when asked whether or not she suggested drone striking Julian Assange, even after he tried working with the State Department [see link]

He was charged for trying to help.

Who is so used to murdering people that they can't recall whether or not they suggested that someone be murdered?

@HillaryClinton, any statements on this, you sick fuck?

JA, in trying to prepare three State Department for the inevitable fallout, accidentally caused witch hunt for leakers in their ranks. Cue the murder of Seth Rich.

Seth Rich, among others, was likely fed information exclusively in order to see if it would leak.

When the Clinton State Department found that exclusive information on Wikileaks, they had Seth Rich murdered and went hard after Assange, since the information proved the movement channels between themselves and Wikileaks.

In order to discredit the information, they tied it in with another bungle involving Trump; "RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA".

Since most Americans think 'hacking' is some type of magic and doesn't need to be proven, they could feign a Russian hacker story.

Guess what folks? Nothing was 'hacked'. Access was granted. It was insider threat. The truth exposes the leaks as fact. The fiction creates a narrative of nefarious opportunists, rather than people who want to stop the corrupt system's perpetuity.

@CodeMonkeyZ, I doubt you'll see this, but can you give a brief explanation on why it is highly unlikely for Russia to have hacked DNC servers without access being granted?

I just don't want this to be only my thoughts in a vacuum.

I know the link does not any anything to do with the DNC server 'hack', but they are interrelated and expose the fact that the DNC and Clinton machine were fully aware of leakers by the time she began her 2016 campaign and would have begun mitigation measures.

@valqrie