Read on Twitter
In 1884 the Fabian Society was formed by a
group of elitists, with the purpose of ushering in a one world oligarchic collectivist state through a process known as Gradualism - a policy of gradual reform from within a system rather than sudden change or violent revolution. https://twitter.com/RosaKoire/status/1339114256415899649
This would become the basis for what is today called Fabian Socialism.
Sovereignty theft by stealth
The global financial elite operate very much in the shadows through a network of secretive and so-called ‘think-tanks’ such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission,
Sovereignty theft by stealth
The global financial elite operate very much in the shadows through a network of secretive and so-called ‘think-tanks’ such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission,
...all with one common purpose, global governance by the elite. In the UK, one of the more well-known groups is the Fabian Society.
The attempts to ‘power grab’ started as far back as 1609 when the House of Commons first tried their luck. They wrote to the House of Lords claiming to be the Knights, Burgess’s and Barons of the High Court of Parliament. The House of Lords replied saying they would never accept
the Commons as Barons and that without them (the Lords) they were not a true court.
Next in 1667 the House of Commons told the House of Lords they 24
could not amend a money bill. A ten-year argument between both Houses ensued until in 1677 the House of Lords agreed not to amend
Next in 1667 the House of Commons told the House of Lords they 24
could not amend a money bill. A ten-year argument between both Houses ensued until in 1677 the House of Lords agreed not to amend
..any money bills. This was the start of the problems we have today.
In 1714 Queen Anne died and King George I came to the Crown. He spoke no English and so unlike all previous Kings and Queens, he did not attend parliament or cabinet meetings.
In 1714 Queen Anne died and King George I came to the Crown. He spoke no English and so unlike all previous Kings and Queens, he did not attend parliament or cabinet meetings.
The government of the day in the Commons were left to do as they liked. King George II spent his entire reign
complaining that his ministers were Kings in his Kingdom and that he was discouraged from attending parliament or cabinet meetings. We know that King George III fought
complaining that his ministers were Kings in his Kingdom and that he was discouraged from attending parliament or cabinet meetings. We know that King George III fought
back and in part reversed that trend. On the 8th March 1784, a vote was taken in Parliament and the King won the vote.
When King George V came to the throne, following Edward VII’s death, he was told by a government minister that he kept all his prerogatives
When King George V came to the throne, following Edward VII’s death, he was told by a government minister that he kept all his prerogatives
but could not use any of them unless he had the backing of a government minister!
When the King accepted this, it was the final nail in the coffin of England. At the same time, Asquith put through the 1911 Parliament Act which purported to remove from the House of Lords
When the King accepted this, it was the final nail in the coffin of England. At the same time, Asquith put through the 1911 Parliament Act which purported to remove from the House of Lords
their ability to reject a bill.
So we now have a situation where Asquith (a Fabian prime minister) had usurped the Royal Prerogative, a clear act of high treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act and a clear act of the subversion of the constitutional arrangements of Parliament.
So we now have a situation where Asquith (a Fabian prime minister) had usurped the Royal Prerogative, a clear act of high treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act and a clear act of the subversion of the constitutional arrangements of Parliament.
The 1911 Parliament Act was a clear case of High Treason against the Constitutional arrangements of Parliament at English Common Law.
Similarly, the 1999 House of Lords Act which removed the hereditary 25
Similarly, the 1999 House of Lords Act which removed the hereditary 25
Peers from their rightful place in Parliament is also High Treason. The Peers should have a constitutional right of personal audience with the Sovereign. This is intended to avoid the problem of "evil counsellors" keeping the Sovereign in ignorance of the people’s grievances.
If this were maintained, we may not be where we are today.
Therefore, it can be seen that according to our Constitutional Law, every Parliament since 1911 has been an unlawful assembly & all laws passed since then are void under English Common Law.
Sovereignty theft by stealth.
Therefore, it can be seen that according to our Constitutional Law, every Parliament since 1911 has been an unlawful assembly & all laws passed since then are void under English Common Law.
Sovereignty theft by stealth.
