Because there are (too many) people arguing in the mentions about why this is a problem: Women are a long-marginalized group. The parity law was meant to address the dominance of men. Telling women "you are allowed this much -- 50% and *no more* -- is further marginalizing.
The law in question, the Savaudet law, is designed to make men and women get equal access to political positions. Making women stay at 50% of political appointees is not equality. It would be true equality if women were 90%+, as men have always been.

https://blogs.eui.eu/genderquotas/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2015/03/Executive-summary-France-Lepinard.pdf
Oh, "90% is not equal," you say? Yes.

Welcome to 10,000 years of male-dominated human history passed off incorrectly as a meritocracy. How obvious the bias, misogyny and chauvinism becomes when any other group starts to gain the same numbers white Christian men always had.
A law limiting women at 50% of political appointments is only a hand up for a few years, then it fills its true function of being a boot stepping down on women's progress into leadership. We're at that point now.
You can follow @moorehn.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.