I think it's profoundly revealing that many activists are objecting to this move rather than celebrating it; since it is manifestly not an effective mechanism for changing or revealing attitudes, the ongoing support for it looks a lot like self-interest. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55309923

Who are the people fundamentally invested in corporate diversity initiatives? Not radicals, who should be pushing for workplace democracy not further control and scrutiny of workers by bosses. Rather a class of grifters and right-wing liberals posing as revolutionaries.

This is how profound the rot is on the left - a union boss should be deeply sceptical of any burden placed on workers rather than their employers - but here she is defending making the subconscious of civil servants a matter for their HR department.

Dare one suggest that strong unions and transparent hiring practices might play a role in ending discrimination rather than subjecting workers to pseudoscientific corporate shamanism in order to improve the organisations PR?