What are some recently proposed forms of epistemic injustice that are claimed not to fit into Fricker's two categories (TI & HI)? There's Dotson & Pohlhaus on contributory/WH, Derek Anderson's work, and I've seen a notion relating to inference doing the rounds.

Yap thinks (plausibly) there are hybrid cases that sit between Fricker's two categories. There's also Kukla's notion of discursive injustice, which gets mentioned in this connection, but some may not think is epistemic. Anything else?

I should say, I'm looking for examples from citable literature - it's not that I'm not interested in new proposals people may have in general, but right now I'm trying to make sure I'm not missing anything in representing the state of the current literature for a specific thing.