Good morning & happy #MonopolyMonday!

This week, we'll be doing something a little different & talking about monopsonies.

Specifically, we'll be talking about three recent *positive* developments for workers against corporate power. đŸ’Ș
2/ First of all, what is the difference between a monopoly & a monopsony?

A monopoly is a dominant company selling something.

A monopsony is a dominant company *buying* something. In this case, monopsonies are dominant companies buying workers’ labor.
4/ Though athletes in other major sports like baseball & football get ~50% of the league’s revenue, @ufc fighters get less than 20%.

Like those working for other monopsonies (cough cough @amazon), they are being underpaid because their employer has too much power.
6/ @ufc has used its power over fighters to pressure fighters to fight while injured and to take a cut of fighters’ sponsorships.

And if the fighters win their case, they could get up to $5 billion in damages.
7/ A good ruling could also bring change for other workers & make more monopsony suits possible in industries with powerful buyers like health care, ag, & transportation!
8/ Next up on the good news docket đŸ“°đŸ—žïžâ€” On Friday, @SenatorBaldwin introduced the EMPOWERS Act, which would give workers more power over how their retirement money is used to invest in and govern corporations.
https://www.baldwin.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/EMPOWERS%20Act%20One-Pager.pdf
9/ Currently, most workers’ retirement savings go to the Big Three asset managers — @blackrock @Vanguard_Group & @StateStreet — and give them extraordinary power over most U.S. companies.

The EMPOWERS Act would give decision-making power back to workers. https://www.economicliberties.us/our-work/new-money-trust/
10/ For more on the Big Three asset managers, check out our previous #MonopolyMonday 👇 https://twitter.com/econliberties/status/1333444922519719941
12/ When the @FTC took this case on, they “resolved” it by telling the clinic's owner and his co-conspirators to stop colluding & not do it again.

@chopraftc called the outcome a “weak, no-consequences settlement.” Which
 it was.
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1552484/171_0134_your_therapy_source_dissentingstatementchopra.pdf
13/ @chopraftc argued that the @FTC could have required the owners to admit to the facts of the case & their guilt, alert workers who had been cheated, and forbid them from working in the therapy staffing industry again.

The @FTC did none of these things.
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1552484/171_0134_your_therapy_source_dissentingstatementchopra.pdf
14/ A year later, this is still a problem.

It’s a lesson for enforcers: Take on more monopsony power cases ESPECIALLY in straightforward situations like wage-fixing or no-poach agreements between employers. 👏
You can follow @econliberties.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.