1. When I once lived on Barton Avenue, there was shop located on the residential street (market/cleaner). It was
a local asset and amenity. https://twitter.com/alexdrmather/status/1338150900146311170

2. Unfortunately, when I last checked, it seemed as though the retail space had been converted to residential use. If so, that asset and amenity has been lost â it cannot be returned to its former use.
3. This is the thing â not only can these local shops not be created, but as legal non-conforming uses, they can only, over time, be lost to attrition. Once the use lapses, it cannot be restored. It is a ratchet that, over time, means they will all eventually become ghost shops.
5. (not dissimilar to the process by which rooming houses, duplexes, triplexes & subdivided houses are lost to conversion to single family use. Decades of policy making it easy for things to become a house, and hard for a house to become anything other than a bigger house.)
6. If we aspire to neighbourhoods that are walkable; that offer a range of housing choices; that offer local service/amenity; that have a sense of place; that donât become single-use single-class enclaves, then âgentle densityâ and âgentle mixityâ are the lowest-hanging fruit. https://twitter.com/dylan_reid/status/1338193219226660867
7. (also on Barton Ave.) https://twitter.com/g_meslin/status/1117202621406875650
8. For neighbourhood-scale shops and multi-res, this would be a good place to start: the collectors & minor arterials, served by transit, yet lined with houses, that run perpendicular to Avenues and through Neighbourhoods. https://twitter.com/plannersean/status/1153643650733289472