A brief thread on ableist words in writing, so cw for that.
So one of the things I've realized since I started consciously rejecting ableist words in writing is that my writing has gotten immeasurably better and more precise. (I do love precise writing, it makes me happy.)
1/
So one of the things I've realized since I started consciously rejecting ableist words in writing is that my writing has gotten immeasurably better and more precise. (I do love precise writing, it makes me happy.)
1/
For example: rather than saying someone is doing something 'blindly,' I now have to select a better, more precise word for their behavior.
Are they doing something bc they're ignoring the realities, or bc they're not aware of risks, or bc they're actually unable to see?
2/
Are they doing something bc they're ignoring the realities, or bc they're not aware of risks, or bc they're actually unable to see?
2/
These nuances matter! Consider:
"She engaged the topic uninformedly, and looked foolish."
"She heedlessly rushed ahead and chose a solution."
"He stumbled away from the house, blinded by the blizzard."
3/
"She engaged the topic uninformedly, and looked foolish."
"She heedlessly rushed ahead and chose a solution."
"He stumbled away from the house, blinded by the blizzard."
3/
The difference between doing something recklessly, ill-advisedly, or physically blinded by something, is not a small one, and by removing that ableist word, you have to think about what you're REALLY trying to say with that word.
4/
4/
Ableist words are a linguistic crutch.
When you work to eliminate them from your speech, you write more precisely.
Something's stupid? Is it really foolish, or a waste of your time, or ill-advised?
5/
When you work to eliminate them from your speech, you write more precisely.
Something's stupid? Is it really foolish, or a waste of your time, or ill-advised?
5/
Something's lame? Is it actually, or is it bad, frustrating, not a good time, or literally anything that's a better description of what's really going on in that situation?
Remove those words as a crutch and become a better communicator.
6/
Remove those words as a crutch and become a better communicator.
6/
If you haven't already started scooping those words out of your vocabulary because they're hurtfulto other human beings, then eliminate them from your speech and writing because they make you a more effective writer and a better communicator.
7/
7/
You have the capacity to be better than that linguistic crutch you've been using.
Prove it.
8/8
Prove it.
8/8
You know what's funny is that I wrote this and was initially very happy with it, and here I am, a person who sometimes uses a cane, talking about a crutch like it's a bad thing.
So let me rephrase, & prove my own point: ableist words and phrases are a lazy linguistic shortcut.
So let me rephrase, & prove my own point: ableist words and phrases are a lazy linguistic shortcut.
They put you in the position of expressing something in an imprecise way that doesn't actually fully explain your idea, using a shorthand that doesn't actually tell people exactly what you mean.
It's not great! And it's hard work to take this stuff out of your speech.
It's not great! And it's hard work to take this stuff out of your speech.