Rs defending the lawsuits to overturn the election aren't being honest about them. On Fox, Scalise insisted that "nobody wants any votes thrown out." But that's what these lawsuits would do. Trump's attorney in WI argued that his vote should be thrown out along with 200k others.

Rs signed onto the Texas case, not any of these WI lawsuits, but the WI lawsuit is important. Rs argued that - for example - people who dropped off their valid absentee ballots at a county-run event in Madison should be disenfranchised.

I'm picking on this because Rs tend to add a word - "legal" - to argue that they're not trying to throw out valid votes. "Legal" has been twisted from meaning "not fraudulent" to, in PA, "anything not cast by mail." But Scalise didn't even use the magic word!