1/Oxford U Evidence-Based Med Clinician Researcher: Mania for mass rtPCR Covid-19 testing is an expensive blunder https://mol.im/a/9046363 

2/ "PCR swabs are key to schemes such as Test & Trace & to imposing tiers of restriction..the foundation of our long-hoped-for recovery. Yet our research has established that these PCR tests are routinely inaccurate. And, they are telling people they have C19 when they do not"

3/ "while a positive result does indeed show someone has come into contact with the virus and was probably infected at some point, this simple yes/no answer cannot tell us how recently they had C19, whether they are still sick or whether they are capable of infecting others"

4/ "Last Friday, an academic journal reported that almost a quarter (24%) of infected staff and patients at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford were still testing positive for C19 a full six weeks after the start of an illness that normally runs its course within 14 days"...

5/..."If that were in any way representative, I’d have to conclude that the official coronavirus figures have been grossly overstated, with all the damage that entails."

6/ "we must treat the Government’s daily tally of cases – often in five figures – with a huge dose of salt. And we must restrict the reporting of positive coronavirus diagnoses to those who are infectious to others. These are the people who matter in a pandemic"

7/ The Oxford Ctr for Evidence-Based Med's own review published 12/3 indicates PCR "+" tests at cycle thresholds >30 are likely non-infectious https://twitter.com/andrewbostom/status/1335575428619177986