@Aella_Girl is trolling @default_friend here but this is actually close to a decent idea.

If you want to hook up, going through Tinder is a LOT of work. It's a search process, like hiring someone for a job, and there's a niche for outsourcing most of that work. https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1337992456051179521

Think Triplebyte but for sex/dating; you interview once with an AI or a professional human (maybe they even have sex with you?) and you get a credential for a particular quality of sex/looks/personality which you can then just reuse with others, with occasional re-qualifications.

You might say this is only of interest to men since women can get laid easily, but women also have to go through an arduous search process to find a man of the right quality.

Women might also be interested in confirming that men are not two-timing them.

(How long does he last in bed? How well endowed is he? Etc. Girls need to know these things.)

If you're going to be a degenerate libertine, at least do it efficiently.

As for searching as a man, looks are in theory easy to check, but in the modern age people are digitally enhancing photos and many people are not even people at all, they are fake.

And there's a game where dating apps show men a lot of women who aren't interested in them as a way of generating a simulation of female interest that encourages the man to pay more money. Tinder has recently become extremely aggressive about this.

You might be OK with paying, but not OK with the uncertain nature of it.

"Pay $50 and we'll give you 3 real-person matches of a certain quality"

vs

"Pay $50 and you'll get to message an unlimited number of women, none of whom will respond"