Beautiful. (h/t @Scientific_Bird)
Beautiful. (h/t @Scientific_Bird)
Beautiful. (h/t @Scientific_Bird)
Beautiful. (h/t @Scientific_Bird)
Beautiful. (h/t @Scientific_Bird)
Now, by the Law of Lemoine about papers that purport to show the world is terribly unfair, if I go and dig into the paper's data/tables, I'm almost guaranteed to find something politically incorrect. I should work but I don't know if I'll resist the temptation.
Okay I couldn't resist and I didn't have to look for very long before the Law of Lemoine was once again vindicated 😂 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615404
Okay I couldn't resist and I didn't have to look for very long before the Law of Lemoine was once again vindicated https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615404
Okay I couldn't resist and I didn't have to look for very long before the Law of Lemoine was once again vindicated https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615404
Okay I couldn't resist and I didn't have to look for very long before the Law of Lemoine was once again vindicated https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615404
The part I really love is that when they reminded the programmers that discrimination could make their algorithms biased, it actually *increased* bias, because they were already biased in favor of women so it made them even more so. This paper is truly a narrative-killer đŸ€Ł
The part I really love is that when they reminded the programmers that discrimination could make their algorithms biased, it actually *increased* bias, because they were already biased in favor of women so it made them even more so. This paper is truly a narrative-killer
The part I really love is that when they reminded the programmers that discrimination could make their algorithms biased, it actually *increased* bias, because they were already biased in favor of women so it made them even more so. This paper is truly a narrative-killer
The part I really love is that when they reminded the programmers that discrimination could make their algorithms biased, it actually *increased* bias, because they were already biased in favor of women so it made them even more so. This paper is truly a narrative-killer
The part I really love is that when they reminded the programmers that discrimination could make their algorithms biased, it actually *increased* bias, because they were already biased in favor of women so it made them even more so. This paper is truly a narrative-killer
To be clear, I think it's very likely this effect isn't real because as a rule priming effects aren't, but I'm going to ignore that and "believe science" for once because it's so beautiful 😄
You can follow @phl43.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.