Read on Twitter
Oldest bro. is an itinerate musician. He was successful and scraped out a living for years, but ultimately it didn't work out (yet?). As youngster, I viewed science as safe in comparison. But when grant-writing now, I often consider parallels b/w music and science as careers. 1/n
Both are intensely creative endeavors. Both are dominated by rock stars. Both are shifting to new publication models (e.g. self-releasing and pre-printing). Both require obsession and hard work. And neither is a guaranteed livelihood anymore (unless you become a star). 2/n
The surviving musicians today are in two camps: 1) The huge stars in the top 0.1%, and 2) those who have adapted by touring more, private house shows, viral media, etc. (in short, working very hard). They eke out a life doing what they love and accept a modest lifestyle. 3/n
Importantly, the changes in the music industry have preceded the parallels in science. So maybe there are future lessons for young PIs from my bro.'s experience? Make sure this is what you want (I do). Then work hard and leverage the new models (preprints, OA, social media). 4/n
Here's a recently released song from my brother's former group (they just re-formed without him, but he co-wrote this track) that might be inspiring for some of you that are grinding the good grind with me. It's about rooting for the underdog:
