1/ Many companies are commercializing #opensource, but what metrics really matter? TL;DR - it’s not GitHub Stars 
We looked at all 134 #oss companies founded since 2015 across their @github metrics to assess which are the most telling, from seed to growth (other channels next)

We looked at all 134 #oss companies founded since 2015 across their @github metrics to assess which are the most telling, from seed to growth (other channels next)
2/ To understand adoption, Issues
growth is the most important, signaling much deeper engagement than Stars
. Growth stage companies have 5x as many Issues
as seed stage companies.



3/ @jasoncwarner offered a fun analogy for understanding this: there are two inputs to a computer—a keyboard
and a mouse
. He values the keyboard
(submitting an Issue) much more than the mouse
(clicking to Star).




4/ To understand contribution, Contributors growth is the most important—especially Serious Contributors (who have made >2 commits). Growth stage companies have 9x as many Issues as seed stage companies.
5/ Here is a framework for #opensource founders to think about GitHub metrics
. We’re continuing to iterate and would love any feedback!

6/ Read the rest of our findings here 

. We're going to look at metrics across more channels and will continue to publish our findings, follow us if you're interested @xuezhao @SheilaVashee @JohnMannes @Rachel_S_Wong https://medium.com/basis-set-ventures/all-that-glitters-like-stars-is-not-gold-metrics-that-matter-when-commercializing-open-source-2f58c8a5b493



7/ The @BasisSet Open Source Index is the most comprehensive list of recent #opensource companies. If you fit the bill and we missed you, let us know https://airtable.com/shrOYJoe8AZn1A5eU /end