1/
Although my school has a reputation as being left-leaning there's wide diversity of viewpoints among students. Many committed centrists, libertarians, conservatives- with great diversity on the left too.

I've gradually learned to elicit thoughtful dialogue across difference.
2/
So many questions that divide us are *harder* on deep reflection than they appear on here. Just last week I heard a thoughtful defenses of the Electoral College and ensuring rural voices are heard. My students write reflections on a time class discussions change their minds--
3/
These are a pleasure to read. One student reflected upon his realization that his smart, informed classmate was actually an undecided voter. Not the parody of an undecided voter, but a person who was still making a decision.
4/
Living in bubbles and learning from our distanced Zoom rooms, it's hard to find genuine opportunities for thoughtful dialogue with someone different from oneself. But I've found that college- even a "liberal" school- offers more of those opportunities than most settings.
5/
I don't know whether any of my students believes the election was rigged. Nor do I know whether any of them believes it was not rigged but nonetheless supports efforts to overturn it. The semester is over and there's nothing left but grading; I'm unlikely to find out.
6/
My job as their teacher isn't to find out. But what if I do? There's a strain of "intellectual diversity" that says if I express intolerance of a partisan view, that's an unacceptable threat to student freedom. But what if one party embraces a lie?

(This is not a drill)
7/
When classes resume the Biden Administration will begin, but much of the country will believe it is illegitimate- spurred by the elected representatives of one party. Almost no college faculty will believe the election was rigged for Biden. Is this bias?
8/
(Narrator: it is not bias).

I teach a class that explores threats to democratic participation- voter suppression, mass incarceration, prosecutorial discretion, to name a few. Will the commentariat expect me to include a section on whatever wrong Texas believes it suffered?
9/
And will attacks on higher ed as unduly/dangerously left-leaning persist while we're struggling in the wreckage of the shameful lie Texas placed before our highest Court and many elected representatives endorsed? I think they will.
10/
There are people who want to burn down one party, or burn down the two-party system. I'm not one of those people. I do believe America can work. I don't believe the chaos we're in now was inevitable.
11/
I've seen enough of America to know that half of us believe in the policies that the GOP embraces. But since Trump, and pleasing Trump, has overridden any good-faith policy preference in the party it no longer seems right to talk about intellectual or political diversity.
12/
Rather, there is a broad spectrum of left-leaning policies loosely organized behind the Dem Party, and there is Trump allegiance. Trump allegiance *Trumps* the left-right framework. It sits outside of ordinary discussions of policy preference- wages, taxes, subsidies, etc.
13/
And there's no getting around the fact that choosing Trump over, e.g.- free and fair elections; truth; federalism; public health; isn't a conservative position per se. But apparently it's a Republican one, at least for now.
14/
So when we talk about intellectual diversity in higher ed we need to define our terms. I encourage the commentariat not to attack professors for declining to respect a baseless lie. We can respect our students without becoming unmoored from truth.

Back to grading I go.//
You can follow @Lara_Schwartz.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.