Read on Twitter
No but we've had lots of interviews in previous years where quotes from only some of the guys were included in group interviews. So why is it only an issue people are mad about this year?
If you can't answer why this year is different, you might be falling for solo logic
If you can't answer why this year is different, you might be falling for solo logic
There's a really alarming amount of M@G@ like groupthink going on with the amount of control some want over reporting. We call out publications when stories are blatantly slander, when they have minor errors, or when they're racist or xenophobic. It's not harmful to not be quoted
It's the same basic argument as line distribution. You weren't in the room. You don't see how all the guys' interview answers contribute to shaping the whole piece. When it's a good piece about BTS, it reflects well on all the guys, regardless of who's quoted
What do you think would upset them more: not being quoted in an article where they're mentioned by name, photographed, and in the video? Or having their Grammy campaign fumbled because fans overstepped and harassed the team behind an article that reflects positively on the group?
