Read on Twitter
THREAD: Enemy Combatants
1. There is a preponderance of evidence that the C C P were involved influencing the outcome of the US 2020 election. The details are available to those who wish to look.
I cannot be convinced that the Military didn’t watch all of this, in real time.
1. There is a preponderance of evidence that the C C P were involved influencing the outcome of the US 2020 election. The details are available to those who wish to look.
I cannot be convinced that the Military didn’t watch all of this, in real time.
2. I cannot be convinced that DNI Ratcliffe isn’t investigating this matter exactly as per the 2018 Executive Order on Foreign Interference in an election.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
I cannot be convinced that Biden will ever get a security clearance, even as a visitor to the WH.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
I cannot be convinced that Biden will ever get a security clearance, even as a visitor to the WH.
3. The eyes of the world are now on the US Military and the Supreme Court (SC).
People are talking of war, cyber-terr0rism, treas0n, Chynese Military troops in Canada and US Naval ships off the coast lines.
Remain calm.
A counter-insurgency must involve the nation's citizens.
People are talking of war, cyber-terr0rism, treas0n, Chynese Military troops in Canada and US Naval ships off the coast lines.
Remain calm.
A counter-insurgency must involve the nation's citizens.
4. The importance of US Military law and the role of the SC reminded of that intriguing (almost scripted) interview between Sen. Lindsay Graham and SC Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing.
[Link at end of thread].
[Link at end of thread].
5. Firstly, Graham invoked the heartstrings by reminding everyone of the 9/11 tragedy AND then got Kavanaugh to confirm that the US was still legally at war, due the Authorization for Use of Military Force resolution of 2001.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-107publ40/pdf/PLAW-107publ40.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-107publ40/pdf/PLAW-107publ40.pdf
6. He then zeroed in on ‘The Law of Armed Conflict’ and when a US citizen becomes and Enemy Combatant.
This was long established in Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).
I found it strange that Kavanaugh was so well-versed on such obscure detail,
This was long established in Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).
I found it strange that Kavanaugh was so well-versed on such obscure detail,
7. without [possibly] knowing that the question was going to be asked.
He also noted that US citizens who collaborated with foreign forces can be tried by the Military and in a couple of cases, they were executed!
This was established by Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
He also noted that US citizens who collaborated with foreign forces can be tried by the Military and in a couple of cases, they were executed!
This was established by Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
8. The theatre between Lindsay Graham and Kavanaugh confirmed a well-developed body of law that confirms that the US Constitution provides no protection to US citizens, if they are collaborating with a foreign enemy.
Here we are at the 2020 election!
Here we are at the 2020 election!
9. I have no idea whether the jurisdiction of the SC and the Military will overlap here, but I do know that Judge Kavanaugh knows exactly what is going on.
Also remember - we are still in the calm ‘before’ the storm!
Link to Kavanaugh interview:
/END/
Also remember - we are still in the calm ‘before’ the storm!
Link to Kavanaugh interview:
/END/
