I know far too little about Indian politics to say much on that story, but the obvious point is there can be an enormous human cost of policy decisions. governments forget that at their peril. When ministers speak of “disruption” with no deal, what is the true human cost of that?
When I was briefly asked to cover no deal brexit for @thesundaytimes last year (a friend called me the “apocalypse and sheep farming correspondent”), what struck me was that risk. The granny who can’t get her medicine; the remote community where the baby formula doesn’t arrive.
Is the job of (good) government not partly to ensure that most of us never have to worry about there being an adequate food and medicine supply? To run a society in which no one feels that they have to stockpile loo paper? That seems a bare minimum.
Anyway, this started as a v personal thread, precisely because the “personal is political”. My baby is 3 days old; even I - a tragic Brexit obsessive - shouldn’t have to be worrying about whether we will end up back at no deal over some fish British people don’t even eat.
And this guy certainly shouldn’t have to (with thanks to @HadleyFreeman for the styling - I think this baby grow belonged in its past life to the twins? Xx)
You can follow @RosamundUrwin.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.