One underappreciated difference in worldviews:

When judging other people's virtue (or lack thereof), do you grade on a curve?

For me it's "yes" - I think it's almost-by-definition impossible for 90% of the population to be horrible people
Whereas by contrast, I notice many others will deem a person horrible for holding a view that's held by, like, 90% the country

... which requires you to believe that 90% of the population are horrible people

... which to me doesn't really make sense
Notice that I'm not saying I "see the good in" people to a greater degree than others do.

Just that I use the ~median levels of human selfishness, myopia, bigotry, hypocrisy, etc. as a baseline to tell me how harshly to judge a given individual
Or to put it another way:

This isn't a disagreement over the facts about what people are like

This is a disagreement over *how to feel about* the facts about what people are like
Or, hmm, I guess it might be more accurate to say it's a disagreement about the proper use of judgmental categories like "lazy" or "selfish" or "despicable"

- I'm saying it doesn't make sense to me to use those words for someone unless they're well below the 50th percentile...
... whereas the way I see some people using those words, it seems like they've got an implicit benchmark in their mind, representing how humans *should* be, and they're judging people relative to that. Rather than the median.
You can follow @juliagalef.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.