Read on Twitter
Tons of disinformation being dumped out there like jet fighters dropping chaff about the TX lawsuit.
Understand this: for the political elite class, this lawsuit MUST be frivolous, it MUST be sedition, it MUST be a stunt, because to them the alternative is UNTHINKABLE.
Understand this: for the political elite class, this lawsuit MUST be frivolous, it MUST be sedition, it MUST be a stunt, because to them the alternative is UNTHINKABLE.
They are holding fast to their conclusion [Biden is going to be President! We are rid of Trump AT LAST!] and dismissing anything that threatens their delicate bubble.
This is actually a POSITIVE THING, that they are in such denial.
This is actually a POSITIVE THING, that they are in such denial.
How much of an EFFECTIVE strategy could the political class mount now that Trump - after careful preparation for weeks - unveiled this TX lawsuit juggernaut when they are spending all their time mocking it and dismissing it out of hand?
It's good to be underestimated.
It's good to be underestimated.
They are not engaging the TX lawsuit on the merits.
Instead they've spent 3 days putting all their efforts into gaslighting about it.
I just read the PA AG's motion to dismiss the TX lawsuit filed with the SCOTUS today.
Nowhere in it does he address the substance.
Instead they've spent 3 days putting all their efforts into gaslighting about it.
I just read the PA AG's motion to dismiss the TX lawsuit filed with the SCOTUS today.
Nowhere in it does he address the substance.
Even the big legal guns who are supposed to be engaging the Tx lawsuit on the merits are refusing to do it.
That's because the argument the TX case is making is simple and deadly & the political elites don't have a good answer for it.
That's because the argument the TX case is making is simple and deadly & the political elites don't have a good answer for it.
The Constitution lays out how federal elections are held and who selects the electors for the Electoral College.
For many years Democratic states have incrementally ignored what the Constitution says about how elections for federal office are to be conducted.
For many years Democratic states have incrementally ignored what the Constitution says about how elections for federal office are to be conducted.
Finally, this year these Democratic states went for it & completely ditched the Constitutional model for federal elections.
You had governors & state courts cutting the legislatures out of the loop as they rewrote federal election laws & deadlines on their own.
You had governors & state courts cutting the legislatures out of the loop as they rewrote federal election laws & deadlines on their own.
At the time they were doing these changes to federal election procedures & changing the deadlines, the state officials **explicitly admitted** they were deliberately freezing out their states' legislatures. They weren't coy about it. They came right out and said it.
On election night, when it was clear Trump was ahead and going to win in a landslide, 6 states stopped counting simultaneously in an obviously coordinated fashion.
Hundreds of thousands of Biden votes were then dumped overnight in statistically improbably fashion.
Hundreds of thousands of Biden votes were then dumped overnight in statistically improbably fashion.
Now these 6 states argue what they did, stopping their counting and then counting past the deadlines on Election Day, were legal because their governors and sec. of state & state courts SAID it was legal.
Perhaps for a STATE election, yes.
For an election for FEDERAL OFFICE?
Perhaps for a STATE election, yes.
For an election for FEDERAL OFFICE?
Only state legislatures can make changes to elections laws and deadlines **involving races for federal offices**.
The governor can't do that, the secretary of state can't do that, and the state courts can't do that.
That's what they TX lawsuit is arguing.
The governor can't do that, the secretary of state can't do that, and the state courts can't do that.
That's what they TX lawsuit is arguing.
Texas is arguing the state officials in these 4 states - GA, MI, WI & PA - held **unconstitutional elections** for federal offices.
They changed the rules for their federal elections while ignoring their state legislatures so they could keep finding & counting votes until the 'right' person was ahead.
And they were pretty damn blatant about what they were doing.
And they were pretty damn blatant about what they were doing.
What Texas is doing is it is pointing out to the Supreme Court that 4 states conducted federal elections in an unconstitutional manner and therefore they elections should be voided and a remedy should be imposed by the court.
There are several remedies available, and should the Court rule to void the unconstitutional federal elections held by these 4 states.
Two of them are:
1. State legislatures picking the electors
2. Order a new election conducted constitutionally.
Two of them are:
1. State legislatures picking the electors
2. Order a new election conducted constitutionally.
Whatever remedy the Court choses, the gambit by these 6 states in going for broke & throwing off the Constitutional rules on how federal elections are conducted & who chooses electors will have exposed them.
For years Democrats incrementally gamed the federal elections system, which is part of our key national infrastructure, which makes this a national security matter.
They pushed deadlines for finding/counting votes until we now have "Election Week" rather than Election Day.
They pushed deadlines for finding/counting votes until we now have "Election Week" rather than Election Day.
If the Court rules as I expect it will, it is going to set a precedent for all 50 states.
The Court will make it very clear that elections for federal offices must be conducted in accordance with the Constitution. States do not get to make up their own laws & deadlines.
The Court will make it very clear that elections for federal offices must be conducted in accordance with the Constitution. States do not get to make up their own laws & deadlines.
I'll end with this:
Clarence Thomas being in position to slam the White House doors shut in Joe Biden's face is one of the biggest plot twists ever.
And I saw this coming weeks ago. https://uncoverdc.com/2020/11/30/the-ghost-of-high-tech-lynchings-past/
Clarence Thomas being in position to slam the White House doors shut in Joe Biden's face is one of the biggest plot twists ever.
And I saw this coming weeks ago. https://uncoverdc.com/2020/11/30/the-ghost-of-high-tech-lynchings-past/
