Examine the particulars in this article relative to the present landscape and then ask yourself, what if the following were true:
1. This is bio-weaponizing for gain of function? It is. Accidents/escapes in labs rarely happen.
2. This ties to the Clintons?
@EntheosShines https://twitter.com/ItsAboutTime45/status/1337143677790064640
1. This is bio-weaponizing for gain of function? It is. Accidents/escapes in labs rarely happen.
2. This ties to the Clintons?
@EntheosShines https://twitter.com/ItsAboutTime45/status/1337143677790064640
What if:
2. This ties to the Clintons? It does. 1996 is at the heart of Clinton's 2 terms.
3. They expected Hillary Clinton to be positioned as POTUS in 2016? They did. A deliberate power outage/loss of internet interceded on Hammer/Scorecard to un-rig the election.
2. This ties to the Clintons? It does. 1996 is at the heart of Clinton's 2 terms.
3. They expected Hillary Clinton to be positioned as POTUS in 2016? They did. A deliberate power outage/loss of internet interceded on Hammer/Scorecard to un-rig the election.
What if:
4. The CIA saw an odd sequence of events coinciding with this? It did. One former director (Colby) ended up dead in a river around the same time there was a directorship transition from Deutch to Tenet.
5. What if the connection to Wuhan isn't by accident?
4. The CIA saw an odd sequence of events coinciding with this? It did. One former director (Colby) ended up dead in a river around the same time there was a directorship transition from Deutch to Tenet.
5. What if the connection to Wuhan isn't by accident?
What if:
5. What if the connection to Wuhan isn't by accident? It isn't. Fauci and the US have a long and document history with China and the lab in Wuhan.
6. Since 1996 they have been developing and beta testing? That's where I'm placing my nickel & it's important.
5. What if the connection to Wuhan isn't by accident? It isn't. Fauci and the US have a long and document history with China and the lab in Wuhan.
6. Since 1996 they have been developing and beta testing? That's where I'm placing my nickel & it's important.
What if:
7. Contemporaneous past outbreaks and pandemics of a similar upper respiratory nature were beta testing and product development and refinement? Again, placing a nickel here.
8. The pandemic construct was always the vehicle to facilitate the great reset? Another nickel.
7. Contemporaneous past outbreaks and pandemics of a similar upper respiratory nature were beta testing and product development and refinement? Again, placing a nickel here.
8. The pandemic construct was always the vehicle to facilitate the great reset? Another nickel.
What if all of that were true? It aligns with the established generational timeline, draws back on the Bush family & demonstrates a logical sequence of planned events used to transition us over time: GHWB:JFK.86>GHWB:CIA/POTUS>Clinton>GWBush911> Obama:fundamentally change US>HRC?
HRC was the closer and Trump disrupted that. From there the existing CV construct was adapted & leveraged as it manifests today to also attack Trump & steal the election. But, it was ALWAYS going to happen - that's a crucial distinction. HRC was the chosen one to usher it in.
We established long ago the exclusive position that Pelosi threw cover to CV & ushered it in with the impeachment construct. Here today & looking back, see how immediate the full ingraining & enmeshing of CV has been into every good, service, point of access, public space, etc.
They ordered "COVID" supplies in 2017? How is this not a long-tenured PLAN? Does it draw back to Bill Clinton? Nickels down.
Here's how they did it. Spread this like a virus. America needs to know what happened to her or we'll never get her back. https://twitter.com/POLITICALMOONS1/status/1335084535189446656?s=20
Here's how they did it. Spread this like a virus. America needs to know what happened to her or we'll never get her back. https://twitter.com/POLITICALMOONS1/status/1335084535189446656?s=20
The supporting information not cited is all documented here: https://politicalmoonshine.com/