1/ With Japan's Nippon Steel announcing carbon neutrality by 2050, what could this mean in the context of the ambitious 🇯🇵 2030 hydrogen target? @TakeshiKuramo @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko @sstapczynski @RENEWIndustry #hydrogen
3/ Disclaimer: I'm not an expert on Japan at all, but some general insights from the perspective of the decarbonization of steel may be interesting in this context.
4/ Given Japan's pledge to become climate-neutral by 2050, the long lifetimes of industrial assets mean that any industrial plant you invest in should use technologies that are compatible with climate neutrality 2050 from now on.
5/ What are the reinvestment cycles of the Japanese steel industry? I don't know, but typically a coal-based blast furnace has a lifetime of 20 years. Assuming a normal distribution, you will have 50% of coal-based blast furnaces that reach the end of their lifetime before 2030.
6/ We did this analysis for primary steel in 🇩🇪, which is the world's 7th biggest steel producer.
Result: 53% of primary steel need reinvestment before 2030
7/ We did this analysis for primary steel in 🇪🇺, which as a bloc is the world's 2nd biggest steel producer.
Result: 48% of primary steel need reinvestment before 2030
8/ Therefore, we can assume the case is probably not so different in Japan: ~50% of primary steel capacity reach the end of its lifetime by 2030 and need reinvestment to sustain current production levels.
9/ Reinvestments into conventional coal-based blast furnaces in the 2020s will create a carbon lock-in and are at a high risk of becoming stranded assets.
11/ EU companies are also ready to move into hydrogen-based DRI for steelmaking:
12/ Let's do some numbers crunching for Japanese steel here:
Steel production 2019: 75 Mt primary steel
Reinvestment need 2030: 37,5 Mt (50%)
EF Blast furnace assumed: ~2 t of CO2/t of primary steel
EF DRI hydrogen: -1,8 t of CO2/t of primary steel (~-90%)
13/ If Japan was to replace all blast furnaces that need reinvestment by 2030 with H2-based DRI it could:
1.) produce 38 Mt of H2-based green steel in 2030
2.) reduce emissions of primary steel by 68 Mt of CO2 compared to business as usual
14/ This amount of green steel would require ~44 TWh of H2* by 2030. This equals 13% of the target (333 TWh). I cannot imagine many applications where hydrogen use is such a no-regret option.
*assumes a ~70% H2/~30% natural gas use (some carbon needed for metallurgical reasons)
15/ Before sufficient amounts of clean hydrogen are available, DRI plants can operate on natural gas reducing emissions by -66% compared to the coal-based blast furnace route. These plants are H2-ready without any major retrofits.
You can follow @KWitecka.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.