Essentially, this was done by establishing the R number* of the DFTD outbreak through time - finding that it has dropped from a peak of 3-4, to around 1 today

* Everyone knows what an R number is now, right? Basically the number of further infections arising from 1 infection
While the reduction in transmission rate is at least partly driven by the lower devil density, it means the disease is not ripping through the devil population at the rate it once was. It also presents further signs that DFTD is very unlikely to drive the devil to extinction
Will temper this with the reminder that this doesn't mean Tasmanian devils are out of the woods *

For one, their populations are vastly reduced, making them more vulnerable to other events. They're also dealing with a second transmissible cancer, DFT2

* They do live there...
Excellent thread here by @AustinHPatton, the lead author of the study, who understands the phylodynamic methods used MUCH better than I do! It’s an extremely novel method that until now, has only really been used on fast reproducing diseases like viruses https://twitter.com/austinhpatton/status/1337154839298502657
You can follow @davidghamilton1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.