Read on Twitter
Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees.
Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is an affront to principles of constitutional democracy.
Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is an affront to principles of constitutional democracy.
Texas obviously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, moot, meritless, and dangerous.
Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election[.]
Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election[.]
The cascading series of compounding defects in Texas’s filings is only underscored by the surreal alternate reality which those filings attempt to construct.
That alternate reality includes an absurd statistical analysis positing that the probability of President-Elect Biden winning the election was “one in a quadrillion.”
Texas’s effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious misuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated.
: 
