So yesterday I'm on the phone with @matthewstoller, asking him deep questions about his life, when the Facebook case drops.

Which is like texting with the pope when the Second Coming comes.

So I began to ask him about it, and he really made me think. https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
I'm gonna share some highlights.

But first of all, I should disclose that I did actually try to interview the pope instead, but he turned me down.

No offense to @matthewstoller.

https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
If you want to understand this antitrust case, you have to understand what Facebook actually is, and most of us don't.

@matthewstoller breaks it down here.

"Facebook is a financial conglomerate."

https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
To unpack that, there are two socially destructive elements here.

There is the business model, which basically involves the eradication of newsgathering operations and local media, especially, as @matthewstoller points out, niche publications like Black-owned newspapers.
And instead of you reading them, Facebook wants you to read whatever will most keep you glued to Facebook, which is not news, not information, but whatever is most addictive, which tends to be "anti-social" content -- rumors, disinformation, and such. https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
So before we go any further, @matthewstoller has elegantly explained that the mission and purpose and business model of Facebook are largely incompatible with your flourishing and my flourishing and democracy's flourishing.

https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
I asked @matthewstoller whether we'd really be better off if Facebook were broken up and there were, say, three companies behaving in this way.

Here's what he said.

https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
ANAND: Based on the history of such cases, would your assumption be that Facebook is broken up within a period of years?

MATT: Yes.

ALSO MATT: It's complicated.

https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
Every time I post about Facebook, a lot of you proudly respond about deleting and boycotting it.

I asked @matthewstoller what he thinks about that bottom-up, consumer-power approach.

"I think it's a bad vision of politics," he said. And he explains why. https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
Monopoly, @matthewstoller argues, isn't an issue the way healthcare is.

It's a worldview. It's a lens through which to examine power.

And it is an alternative to democracy rather than a policy question within democracy.

Because either there is private government or public.
And stay for the kicker:

"I do think that they have power. I just don't think they're secretly hypnotizing us. I think these people are — I’ll use a Zuckerberg quote about Twitter, which is a great quote — 'a clown car that fell into a gold mine.'" https://the.ink/p/we-can-have-democracy-or-we-can-have
You can follow @AnandWrites.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.