Kate Scottow has won her appeal and her conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act is quashed

On valentines day last year she was convicted for a dozen tweets of using a public communications network to “cause annoyance, inconvenience and anxiety” https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-stand-with-kate-scottow
This is how the whole thing started...

https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1228255304628002816

From here the criminal justice system was used to harass and terrorise a woman for mildly annoying tweets.
On the day of the trial 30 women watched

Hayden- who made the complaint would not sit in the public seats alongside us after giving evidence. The judge gave a special seat alongside the police officer, behind the prosecuting counsel, staring out Kate as she gave her evidence
Judge Dodd said "we teach our children to be kind" as she handed down a guilty verdict to Kate

She said Kate's tweets such as pig-in-a-wig were "not part of a debate" but abuse "There are legitimate ways to debate & express disapproval of a POV on line, and abuse is not one"
The Law Commission is currently proposing to replace s.127 with a law based on causing emotional harm.

Freedom of speech must include freedom to be annoying & cause offence.

Police officers & district judges cannot decide what is legitimate debate

https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/reform-of-the-communications-offences/
You can follow @MForstater.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.