1. Solid complaints from FTC & 48 AGs suing Facebook for violating antitrust laws -- and requesting divestitures/breakups, among other forms of relief. Hopeful that it marks yet another step forward in the growing efforts to rehabilitate antitrust laws & recover antimonopoly.
2. States' complaint is especially impressive. Tight narrative, compelling facts, told in a way where the full force of the story really lands. It's a persuasive document, fully showcasing how Instagram & WhatsApp acquisitions were part of broader monopoly maintenance strategy.
3. States' complaint also reveals a sophisticated understanding of harms. It notes FB entered market by competing on privacy, but degraded privacy once it had eliminated rivals & secured a safe monopoly position -- an echo of @DinaSrinivasan's excellent work.
4. States also note that when seeking approval for WhatsApp acquisition, FB told enforcers (including FTC) that it wouldn't combine data sets or use WhatsApp data for ads. A few years later it did so anyway. European Commission fined FB $122M for the deception. FTC did nothing.
(5. At the time of the deal @EPICprivacy & @DigitalDemoc raised alarms with FTC, prompting FTC to tell FB that reneging on WhatsApp's privacy commitments could violate law and/or a preexisting FTC order. This whole episode is absent from FTC complaint
https://epic.org/2016/08/facebook-to-collect-whatsapp-u.html )
7. States also describe how acquiring Onavo (& the surveillance of rivals it enabled) was key to FB's strategy for identifying competitive threats at the earliest stages. They note FB foreclosed other firms from having access to Onavo data.
8. States discuss several other competitive threats FB acquired or cut off from APIs. Complaint marshals full set of facts in a very effective way. Net effect is clear picture of how FB's conduct was systemic, exactly what you want for Sec 2 (though states also sued under Sec 7).
9. Interestingly FTC sued only under Sec 2, not Sec 7. Also notable that many of the docs cited to show Instagram & WhatsApp purchases were illegal were available at the time FTC reviewed the deals (though FTC investigated only Instagram ($1bn) in depth, not WhatsApp ($19bn)).
10. Many of the Instagram docs cited build on the material the House Antitrust Subcommittee made public through its investigation. In July @JerryNadler confronted Zuckerberg with some of this evidence https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4929455/user-clip-nadler-fb-instagramwa-full
11. Finally, both FTC's and states' request for relief includes requirements that would implicate future acquisitions. FTC requests "a prior notice and prior approval obligation for future mergers and acquisitions."
12. States request FB be prohibited from deals valued at or > $10million without first informing the states, & that FB submit deal-related disclosures it'd make to FTC/DOJ. This is potentially very significant. 48 AGs would have chance to review these deals, not just FTC/DOJ.
13. Notably, during the course of the investigation FB acquired Giphy, which FB could use to deprive rivals of access and/or to collect significant data. FB didn't report the deal to enforcers, presumably bc it was structured to avoid reporting thresholds. https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/15/21259965/facebook-giphy-gif-acquisition-buy-instagram-integration-cost
14. And just this week Facebook purchased Kustomer, a business software company, reportedly for ~$1 billion. So two days before being sued by the federal government & 48 AGs for a series of illegal acquisitions, Facebook made another acquisition. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/30/facebook-acquires-kustomer-a-crm-start-up.html
You can follow @linamkhan.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.