lets compare auston matthews and nathan mackinnon!
matthews' first four years (282GP):
G: 158
P: 285
P/60: 3.23
GAR: 54.5
WAR: 10.8
xGAR: 80.5
xWAR: 15
mackinnons first four years (300GP):
G: 75
P: 206
P/60: 2.24
GAR: 41.2
WAR: 7.8
xGAR: 25.3
xWAR: 4.8
so anyways,
matthews' first four years (282GP):
G: 158
P: 285
P/60: 3.23
GAR: 54.5
WAR: 10.8
xGAR: 80.5
xWAR: 15
mackinnons first four years (300GP):
G: 75
P: 206
P/60: 2.24
GAR: 41.2
WAR: 7.8
xGAR: 25.3
xWAR: 4.8
so anyways,
lets do at even strength thats even more fun!
auston matthews since entering the league at EV (282GP):
113 G (1st)
1.54 G/60 (1st)
190 P (10th)
2.59 P/60 (7th)
nathan mackinnon in that same time period at EV (307GP):
81 G (10th)
1 G/60 (41st)
196 P (7th)
2.41 P/60 (19th)
auston matthews since entering the league at EV (282GP):
113 G (1st)
1.54 G/60 (1st)
190 P (10th)
2.59 P/60 (7th)
nathan mackinnon in that same time period at EV (307GP):
81 G (10th)
1 G/60 (41st)
196 P (7th)
2.41 P/60 (19th)
i'd argue nathan mackinnon has not been the more valuable player even in the last four years of his rise to elite-ness 
so in conclusion if you can get past the fact that he plays for the leafs, you should probably start your franchise with auston matthews not nathan mackinnon

so in conclusion if you can get past the fact that he plays for the leafs, you should probably start your franchise with auston matthews not nathan mackinnon