Read on Twitter
"The Court ordered that in a mere 2.5 hours, Appellants were to submit a “supplemental brief identifying the specific portions” of the 35pg district court order that is the subject of this appeal “by pg and paragraph number, and accompanied by citations to the record."
”To put this Herculean task in context, the Order contains 177 discrete findings of fact, many of which contain their own citations to the record. Appellants’ draft appendix of record stretches over 13 volumes, and exceeds 2,500 pages.”
”Appellants are concerned that they are being requested to brief their entire appeal in just a couple hours; if that is true, Appellants hereby register their express request that the Court permit further supplemental briefing on a practicable timetable.”
“While Nevada Rules of Appellate Produce (“NRAP”), rule 2 permits this Court to alter and/or suspend its own rules and process an appeal as the Court directs, the Court cannot and should not do so at the total expense of due process.”
“Particularly given the critical, nationally important issues at stake in this appeal. Appellants intend no disrespect, but must register their objection to the lightspeed process imposed here.”
We were given just 2.5 hours to brief, line-by-line, our argument against the district court's ruling. Read it for yourself: https://bit.ly/39W8hAP
This was not a fair process. Our case should have been heard.
This was not a fair process. Our case should have been heard.
