According to this piece, citing internal documents, they explicitly used dicamba's tendency to volatilize and harm neighbors crops as a linchpin for marketing dicamba-tolerant soybeans & cotton.
But the boldness with which they pursued it is 👀. Bayer has agreed to pay farmers $400 million to settle past dicamba damage. But the racket is ongoing. After a federal judge banned this use of dicamba this summer, the Trump EPA reinstated it, with a supposed drift fix.
Bob Hartzler, an eminent Iowa State University weed expert (and very early whistleblower on Monsanto's false claim that glyphosate resistance would *never* be a problem) told me this: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/as-election-day-nears-trumps-epa-chief-gives-georgia-cotton-farmers-the-gift-of-a-nasty-pesticide/
In other words, in 2021, farmers throughout the soybean/ cotton belt will be spraying a toxic chemical that will very likely be vaporizing and traveling far from targeted fields. Kicker: exposure to the stuff appears to heighten risk of liver cancers. https://academic.oup.com/ije/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ije/dyaa066/5827818?redirectedFrom=fulltext
This is something the Biden EPA will have to deal with immediately. I think there should be a Congressional investigation about how this jaw-dropping corporate scandal played out in full sight of US regulators. Let's not forget it was the Obama-Biden EPA that initially ...
... approved these products, despite widespread knowledge about their volatility and despite having extremely limited data from the companies about their allegedly—it turns out, not at all—"low volatility" formulations.
You can follow @tomphilpott.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.