In my 2017 novel WALKAWAY, there's a scene where the protagonists get into a self-driving car owned by a ruthless plutocrat, only to discover that it moves faster than any other vehicle they've ever ridden.

https://craphound.com/category/walkaway/

1/
The plute explains that he's done an illegal mod that lets him override the lane-change safety margins and pay fines for it - an illustration of the principle that "a fine is a price."

It was meant as broad satire, not a suggestion.

2/
Specifically, it was meant to satire the idea that if you create "markets in everything" you'll get efficient allocations - some people REALLY want to change lanes and others only SORTA want to change lanes but the lane-change slots aren't allocated according to priority.

3/
There are so many flaws in this idea, but the biggest one is that some people are VERY rich and most people are VERY broke and so a willingness on the part of a rich person to pay $X may indicate a mild preference, but a poor person might be indicating a strong preference.

4/
If $X is 100% of a poor person's disposable income and 0.000001% of a rich person's disposable income, the rich person's whims trump the poor person's needs. This is going on around us, all the time.

5/
Remember when Homer charged a $1000 baldness cure that revolutionized his life to the company insurance and cost Mr Burns his ivory-handled back-scratcher?

Burns: I was going to buy that ivory back scratcher. How did he do it?

Smithers: He charged the company for Dimoxinil.

7/
Back to Walkaway. Cyberpunk has a funny relationship with capitalism's most ardent trufans: inevitably, the parts that are meant as warnings are read as suggestions.

8/
Which brings me to Ford's Patent 20200380860: "Smart Contract Formation, Handling and Fulfilment Between Vehicles."

https://trea.com/information/smart-contract-formation-handling-and-fulfilment-between-vehicles/patentapplication/ed72fddf-403e-4e5d-aeea-03cb2701296c

9/
It's written in the garbage legalese of all patent applications, but @patentdrop provides a handy translation: "imagine a car wants to merge... other vehicles would need to slow down, and in turn an inconvenience is created for them.

https://www.newzstack.com/newsletters/015-patent-drop

10/
"Ford is proposing a system where the vehicles that need to slow down receive a payment for slowing down, while the vehicle that wants to do the slowing down, incurs a payment."

11/
But there's more! Are you using a private vehicle on a route served by public transit? You stand to be compensated!

"If a light changes prematurely to accommodate a bus, this could entitle all vehicles with a certain distance of the light to light to a certain payment."

12/
I would say "You can't make this shit up," except that I make this shit up for a living, but - and I can't repeat this often enough - as a warning, not a suggestion.

eof/
You can follow @doctorow.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.