Read on Twitter
With the NDAA authorizing a Pacific Deterrence Initiative, good time to look back at the long path to get to this point. https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2020/12/03/compromise-defense-bill-confronts-a-rising-china/
The idea was first raised 5 years ago in a hearing: "While the department has initiated a European Reassurance Initiative in Europe, it is clear to me that a similar Asian reassurance initiative should be considered." -McCain, February 2016 https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/16-15_02-23-16.pdf @dustinrwalker
McCain then included the concept in his FY18 defense budget/strategy document. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-asia-mccain/mccain-proposes-7-5-billion-of-new-u-s-military-funding-for-asia-pacific-idUSKBN15802T
Without support from the Carter or Mattis Pentagon's, the idea withered for several years until Secretary Esper was confirmed and Senator Hawley decided to push it publicly again. https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2019/11/15/us-senator-talks-foreign-policy-reset-and-a-clear-and-present-danger-from-china/
Earlier this year Chairman Inhofe and Ranking Member Reed joined forces in a bipartisan push for the concept.
https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/press-releases/inhofe-and-reed-in-war-on-the-rocks-the-pacific-deterrence-initiative_-peace-through-strength-in-the-indo-pacific
https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/press-releases/inhofe-and-reed-in-war-on-the-rocks-the-pacific-deterrence-initiative_-peace-through-strength-in-the-indo-pacific
Congress has taken steps to elevate the idea and direct new funding, but it will only be as successful as the EDI if the Pentagon embraces it as a useful tool and builds it into the annual budget process. This should be a central focus for upcoming SASC nominees.
