Read on Twitter
Thread: I'm listening to a Sharyl Attkisson podcast about all the allegations of fraud in the election, and the thought occurred to me that I should compile my own list. Many of these are well-known to my readers.
What I'm going to do is put these in categories.
1) Clear violations of the state election laws
2) Evidence of fraudulent localized behavior
3) Evidence of computer fraud
1) Clear violations of the state election laws
2) Evidence of fraudulent localized behavior
3) Evidence of computer fraud
Category 1, clear violations of state election laws, occurred in EVERY contested state. This is evidence of a coordinated, planned activity. There are numerous affidavits in every lawsuit attesting to this behavior. I will list a few.
GA: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf
Signatures not being checked
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.12.pdf
Poll watchers not allowed to observe the counting https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.12.pdf
Signatures not being checked
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.12.pdf
Poll watchers not allowed to observe the counting https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.12.pdf
MI: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.3.pdf
Poll challenger not allowed to record official challenges
Counting ballots while watchers and challengers were absent
Poll challenger not allowed to record official challenges
Counting ballots while watchers and challengers were absent
PA: Numerous affidavits of poll watchers being thrown out, being "corralled" too far from the counters to adequately observe the counting.
GA: Chain of custody not maintained on absentee ballots, locks missing, open containers, etc.
GA: Chain of custody not maintained on absentee ballots, locks missing, open containers, etc.
All of these behaviors demonstrate a willful disregard for election laws. The fact that the exact same or quite similar behaviors occurred in multiple states is indicative of a criminal conspiracy.
Category 2, widespread fraudulent behavior.
GA: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf
Pristine ballots machine marked, all for Biden
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.14.pdf
Absentee ballots voted illegally
GA: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf
Pristine ballots machine marked, all for Biden
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.14.pdf
Absentee ballots voted illegally
MI: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.0_1.pdf
Fraudulent addition of voter names and birth dates to the voter rolls
Backdating absentee ballots to make them "legal"
Counting ballots multiple times
Counting ballots without signatures
Fraudulent addition of voter names and birth dates to the voter rolls
Backdating absentee ballots to make them "legal"
Counting ballots multiple times
Counting ballots without signatures
AZ: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923.1.0.pdf
Out of state voters voting absentee
Dead voters voting absentee
Out of state voters voting absentee
Dead voters voting absentee
Category 3, Evidence of Computer Fraud
Although each lawsuit contains relevant evidence of computer fraud, the blockbuster findings of Edward Solomon, that I tweeted last night, provide irrefutable proof that an algorithm was used to steer the vote in Biden's favor.
Although each lawsuit contains relevant evidence of computer fraud, the blockbuster findings of Edward Solomon, that I tweeted last night, provide irrefutable proof that an algorithm was used to steer the vote in Biden's favor.
Solomon's mathematical proof of the algorithm used by the voting machines has been submitted to the Sidney Powell team, and he will appear as an expert witness. The beauty of his proof is that a simple canvass of one precinct will prove his evidence.
Since his video is more than 2 hours long and contains a great deal of mathematical mumbo-jumbo, I'm going to lay out for you exactly what took place in the election. The voting systems have the ability to create virtual precincts and allocate votes to them.
Once the virtual precincts have been allocated their vote totals, they begin taking over actual precincts and altering the vote. At times, in order for the algorithm to allocate sufficient votes to guarantee a win, extra votes have to be inserted into the system.
The really evil part of the system is that these "extra" votes are real votes. The system has the ability to enter votes that will be adjudicated later. IOW, you can stack up votes in a holding pattern and release them later. When they're released, the algorithm allocates them.
This explains why the systems had to be halted. The algorithm was preset to provide a certain percentage of the vote to Biden and a slightly lower percentage to Trump, to make the election look legitimate. But Trump votes were pouring in at an alarming rate.
In order to catch up, they had to inject a bunch of ballots into the system. That's why they had boxes of ballots under a table in GA. A contingency plan. These are not ALL illegal ballots. For purposes of the algorithm, the legality of the ballots is irrelevant.
It's the quantity that matters. So, they hold back a large number of ballots as a contingency. But, they ALSO have a large number of ballots that have already been run through the system but remain unadjudicated. Think of all of these ballots as a pool to draw from.
The machines are only capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. Five machines and run 15,000 ballots an hour. So, a two-hour window, like they had in GA can only inject about 45,000 ballots into the system.
The way you get 140,000 ballot jumps all at once is a combination of running ballots through the system and ballots that have already been processed but remain unadjudicated. Once you have sufficient numbers, you just punch the adjudication button, and voila! Major ballot dump.
The 140,000 ballots get dumped into multiple virtual precincts. Those precincts then perform the tasks of taking over real precincts, injecting the proper votes for that precinct (to hide the fraud), and then altering the counts so Biden wins the overall vote.
For example, a precinct might have 2,500 voters. Normally, the precinct would vote 67% Biden, 32% Trump, 1% third-party. After alteration, the precinct will vote 81% Biden, 15% Trump, and 3% third-party. The precinct still has 2,500 votes for 2,500 voters.
But, instead of Trump getting 800 votes, he gets 375. Biden gets the other 425. Do this in enough precincts, and your guy wins. But they don't do this in every precinct. That would be too obvious.
If you spot check precincts, and you chose the wrong ones, you'll never see the fraud. The untouched precincts will look perfectly normal. The altered precincts will look odd, but the oddities can be explained away.
That's why you're hearing things like Trump lost votes in the suburbs. It's explained away as Trump lost some of the suburban vote because he turned off soccer moms. The heavy Dem precincts go heavier for Biden. The heavy GOP precincts go lighter for Trump. He still wins them.
Just not by as much as would have been expected. And it can all be explained away. Until you see Edward's demonstration and realize that how you vote is completely irrelevant.
Your vote can count for Trump or Biden or the third-party candidate, depending on the algorithm's allocation of votes. That's how evil and truly pernicious this software is. If it isn't stopped, we will never have another election in America. And we won't have America.
Addendum: Obvious, in this tweet, I meant a three-hour window. A two-hour window would only inject 30,000 votes into the system. https://twitter.com/PaulSchmehl/status/1335655366995144704?s=20
Addendum2: If you’re interested in listening to Sharyl Atkkisson’s podcast (mentioned in the first tweet in this thread) you can find it here: https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/12/a-semi-comprehensive-list-of-2020-election-fraud-allegations-podcast/
