Read on Twitter
Amazing how many corporate journalists tried to attack my article from yesterday not by linking it or engaging its argument but posting a screen-shot of the headline.
This is their vapid in-group tactic: pleading for strength in numbers to ridicule anyone outside their clique: https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1335246321293422592
This is their vapid in-group tactic: pleading for strength in numbers to ridicule anyone outside their clique: https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1335246321293422592
Many of them try to imply my writing is now bad because I write without an editor since I went to Substack.
It's a lie: I've written without an editor for 15 years. I'm really sorry it's worked, and that I don't need @TheAtlantic to find an audience or do impactful journalism.
It's a lie: I've written without an editor for 15 years. I'm really sorry it's worked, and that I don't need @TheAtlantic to find an audience or do impactful journalism.
The more these journalists who need large media corporations for an audience & self-esteem realize how distrusted and hated they are, the more bitter & resentful they get toward anyone who succeeds without them. Here's the article to judge for yourself: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/after-the-deep-state-sabotaged-his
This is the same reason, by the way, so many mainstream journalists hate Assange & are happy to see him *imprisoned.* Why would journalists hate someone who broke more huge stories than they ever will? That's the reason: he didn't need them or their media corporations to do it.
Anything that poses a threat to the ability of mainstream media corporations and their employees to monopolize discourse and control information -- Patreon, Substack, Joe Rogan, WikiLeaks, social media, etc. -- they will hate and wage war on to try to either demonize or control.
