Read on Twitter
The embedded thread is not getting the traction it deserves. This is probably owing to its technical nature. Its importance cannot be overstated. Instead of retweeting the header, this time I retweet one of its bombshells: 1/6 https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1334989954221568001?s=20
@robinmonotti's main point is that the @WHO's testing guidelines were modified to promote significant false positives, even pointedly dropping the measures designed to avoid them, as illustrated in a reply to the thread: 2/6 https://twitter.com/giant_weed/status/1335247874033061889?s=20
Months ago, I'd heard a story that labs were testing with one primer, but ignored it as laughable. This image shows exactly that happening, in Italy. 3/6
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EobVS0CXMAI6cqZ?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EobVS0CXMAI6cqZ?format=jpg&name=small
Combined with the ridiculous cycle thresholds being deployed, the situation goes beyond farce. Then we add this observation: 4/6 https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1335238736842551297?s=20
With no response to the Corman-Drosten review paper, and the journal it attacks having declined to disclose its peer review process (hint: this likely means there was none), the conclusion is clear. 5/6 https://cormandrostenreview.com
A significant fraud has been perpetrated. All PCR testing should cease until this is sorted out, if it even can be. You can toss all your cases and deaths data, and those vaccine trial results. 6/6
