https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
@POTUS RT'd 12.04 /15:07:03 EST
day AFTER
SCOTUS Justice Alito, accepted emergency injunction by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-PA,
& Docket filed #20A98
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162573/20201203162739451_Final_Emergency%20Application%20for%20Writ%20of%20Injunction.pdf
98==>> 17
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162596/20201204001844806_LLF_Amicus_Brief.pdf
At issue: Act 77 violation by PA Supreme Court. https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1333948670740492288

https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/pennsylvania-dont-assume-alito-giving-until-12-9-to-respond-to-emergency-application-means-hes-letting-it-die-on-the-vine/
@marklevinshow’s Landmark Legal Foundation has filed an Amicus Brief laying out the defects w/ the PA Supreme Court Act 77 ruling.

ALITO gave PA & other Respondents until next WED to file responses, 12.09, by 4 pm EST.

Did ALITO set a ‘Safe Harbor’ trap Re: PA response AFTER 12.08?
https://noqreport.com/2020/12/04/did-justice-alito-set-a-safe-harbor-trap-by-setting-pennsylvania-response-deadline-a-day-after/
ie,
as long as Kelly’s petition is on the Docket at SCOTUS, “controversies & contests over electors & electoral votes” have NOT been remedied nor resolved,

then U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5) NULL.

"Maybe it’s to lay the groundwork for use of a “MOAB” (“Mother of all Bombs”) remedy with respect to PA."
https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/12/05/is-there-another-scenario-that-makes-justice-alitos-dec-8-response-date-meaningful-in-different-way-n289672

To show the PA Supreme Court has made itself into little more than an extension of the partisan political machine run by the PA Democrat Party??