When normies talk about racism they arent talking about racism

They're talking about a personality type that looks for excuses to conduct malicious behavior and get a pat on the back. The ever-elusive "bully" archetype.

You can tell because their axioms for racism involve the arbitrary nature of race, and all attempts to make race unarbitrary are seen as apologetics for ourguys to harass women and minorities for funsies without repercussion.

When you say "democrats are the real racists" it doesnt mean anything because neither side agrees with what racism means as a conceptual dynamic. To them, their intent alone excludes them by virtue of not being arbitrary, of them believing themselves to be in "good faith"

When somebody calls you a homophobe, and explains that you just hate all gays for no reason, no amount of rationale is going to convince them because they think you're literally lying to create a context for malicious behavior out of a sadistic impulse. This is no-trust society.

When you say "well homosexuality seems to be transmitted by rape and we dont have observed case studies to demonstrate normative homosexuality" they think you're lying about what you believe. Could be a matter of projecting how performative they are about their beliefs.

I dont know how to resolve this conflict, but in identifying its nature, I'm hoping somebody more competent than myself can dissect and make sense of a rhetoric based solution to the crisis. Maybe @0x49fa98 or @mc_swm or @LevPo or @ARIOSOPHY could do so.

The complex aspect of the crisis is rooted in epistemics, mostly.

"Crime statistics? Those are fake, manufactured in order to justify (sadistic impulse without consequence)!"

These people dont believe in "Good Faith" and in a sense are more conspiracy-minded than us for that.