1/ Big Picture IMO
Giuliani and Trump aren't showing all their legal cards.
Reading Foley paper tweeted by CodeMonkey w/their Plan,
they believe courts will throw out tainted ballots, giving State Legislatures grounds to chuse Trump Electors.
Giuliani and Trump aren't showing all their legal cards.
Reading Foley paper tweeted by CodeMonkey w/their Plan,
they believe courts will throw out tainted ballots, giving State Legislatures grounds to chuse Trump Electors.
2/ Key to plan: PA, other states, will submit Biden Electors regardless of court rulings, blessed by secy of state and governor certifications (ex: AZ).
Historically, SCOTUS and lower courts have been involved in counting disputes.
Historically, SCOTUS and lower courts have been involved in counting disputes.
3/Courts limited
SCOTUS has no proper role prescribing the Elector Votes the VP counts on Jan 6 2021, per Constitution.
It all comes down to Pence.
If VP sees 2 slates of Electors for PA, he decides which slate to count, or can designate the count as disputed— counting neither.
SCOTUS has no proper role prescribing the Elector Votes the VP counts on Jan 6 2021, per Constitution.
It all comes down to Pence.
If VP sees 2 slates of Electors for PA, he decides which slate to count, or can designate the count as disputed— counting neither.
4/ If Pence sides w/courts and counts Trump Elector Votes, the Dems walk out, forcing UNDECIDED outcome, triggering 12th & 20th Amendments and 3 U.S.C. § 15
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15
5/ IMO, the Elephant in the Room are 'Chinese' chips in all new voting machines, allowing remote manipulation by hostile foreign governments.
I believe incontrovertible evidence of this will be presented to the Supreme Court and a much deeper, broader ruling will be given.
I believe incontrovertible evidence of this will be presented to the Supreme Court and a much deeper, broader ruling will be given.
6/ We are putting on a show right now, so Americans can see how filthy the election process is.
Q gave us crumbs for the ChinaChip path, largely ignored. If the CIA can crash a car or plane with computer chips, they DEFINITELY put those remote-access chips in voting machines.
Q gave us crumbs for the ChinaChip path, largely ignored. If the CIA can crash a car or plane with computer chips, they DEFINITELY put those remote-access chips in voting machines.
7/ If Dominion voting tallies are tossed post remote-access
w/ incontrovertible evidence China* manipulated outcomes,
then the Swamp plan fails, and we take back CA.
* if tech companies R guilty, the public sleeps.Evidence MUST tie manipulation to hostile gov't to wake public.
w/ incontrovertible evidence China* manipulated outcomes,
then the Swamp plan fails, and we take back CA.
* if tech companies R guilty, the public sleeps.Evidence MUST tie manipulation to hostile gov't to wake public.
8/ FYI, the Foley paper chose Elizabeth Warren as the likely Dem candidate running against Trump. lmao
I'd bet my bottom dollar, we infiltrated comms to get Biden in there, the China$$ pedo w/dementia. Trump would've had fun going against Pocahontas too.
https://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/students/publications/llj/pdfs/vol-51/issue-2/7_Foley%20(309-362).pdf
I'd bet my bottom dollar, we infiltrated comms to get Biden in there, the China$$ pedo w/dementia. Trump would've had fun going against Pocahontas too.
https://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/students/publications/llj/pdfs/vol-51/issue-2/7_Foley%20(309-362).pdf
9/ For reference. Pg 21 -> was meat of their strategy.
Nutshell: When SCOTUS rules, it will be framed as China vs. United States, w/China attempting a takeover,
not merely states trying to resolve disputed vote tallies, as contemplated by 3 U.S.C., 12th & 20th.
They will FAIL
Nutshell: When SCOTUS rules, it will be framed as China vs. United States, w/China attempting a takeover,
not merely states trying to resolve disputed vote tallies, as contemplated by 3 U.S.C., 12th & 20th.
They will FAIL