Interrupting your last-hour-of-Friday scrolling to ponder the value of natural science collections.

A thread 👇
I absolutely love museum collections and their ability to help wildlife. At @LeedsMuseums we have around 800,000 dead animals and plants, and this is just a fraction of the distributed national collection. A tiny amount is on display, the rest we use for education and research.
Crucially, in the throes of our climate crisis, museum collections can be used to track the impact of climate change. This study used museum specimens to look at how edible mussels are being affected: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.15417
Museum collections can be used to map species' distribution changes, like this Mexican project: https://www.nature.com/articles/416626a. They can also shed light on extinct animals and their stories, like Thylacine distribution: https://www.eva.mpg.de/documents/Wiley-Blackwell/White_Ancient_JBiogeo_2018_2522118.pdf
And of course, I can’t finish off without mentioning that natural science collections are the UK’s favourite according to a 2008 London museum survey: http://www.natsca.org/files/London%20survey.pdf and a 2013 Jenesys survey of museum visitors: https://natsca.org/sites/default/files/publications-full/Evaluation-Report-Museum-Gallery-Preferences-Final_0.pdf

đź’…
You can follow @CuratorClare.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.