In a widely quoted statement, @GaSecofState Brad #Raffensperger said that ”Pro V&V found no evidence” of tampering with the machines.

But he failed to disclose that the company had a preexisting relationship with #Dominion that dated back years.
According to @EACgov's website, it appears there are only 2 accredited testing labs for the entire country: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance.

Although Pro V&V is listed as being accredited, the link for Pro V&V’s accreditation certificate leads to a “page could not be found” warning.
#Dominion embarked on a software modification to address the problem, which required testing validation from Pro V&V as the software had now been changed.

There was some disagreement as to the breadth of the software changes made.
The official designation of the software being deemed “de minimis” was important, as it would have bearing on the need for complete @EACgov recertification of the #DominionVotingSystems—something that might require more time than was available ahead of the #2020Election.
Pro V&V’s position was formally disputed in an Oct. 3 declaration from Dr. J. Alex Halderman, a security expert, who stated that the “report makes clear that Pro V&V performed only cursory testing of this new software.
On Dec. 3, during a #Georgia Senate Government Oversight Committee meeting on #ElectionFraud, Ryan Germany, counsel for @GASecofState’s office, again addressed the issue of the #DominionVotingSystems equipment audit, noting that:
You can follow @EpochTimes.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.